Paternity in the Australian brush-turkey, Alectura lathami, a megapode bird with uniparental male care

Male Australian brush-turkeys, Alectura lathami, provide allparental care by building and tending large incubation mounds.Females visit and lay eggs in the mounds of several males sequentially,but they provide no parental care after laying. Because malesand females meet only briefly at mounds to copulate and lay,males have no obvious means of ensuring paternity. I used DNAfingerprinting techniques to determine paternity for 65 brush-turkeychicks. Eighteen chicks (27.7%) did not match the mound-tendingmale. Some of these paternity exclusions were evidently causedby females switching rapidly from one mound to another, butthe majority (23.1% of eggs) appeared to result from femalescopulating with males other than the one in whose mound theywere currently laying. However, the frequency of these copulations(43%) was much lower than the estimated frequency with whichthey fertilized eggs, perhaps because their timing during theovulatory cycle differed relative to most other copulations.The percentage of eggs excluded in paternity analyses rangedfrom 20.0% to 43.8% for individual males but did not appearto affect male parental care. Several factors favor male parentalcare regardless of paternity. Males can accommodate eggs fromseveral females in one mound, which increases the opportunitiesfor additional matings without increasing the cost of parentalcare. In addition, paternity appears to be unpredictable andhard to assess, and a facultative reduction in care would bedifficult without abandoning a mound entirely.     

Extrapair paternity in the great tit (Parus major): a test of the "good genes" hypothesis

In 1993 and 1994 we determined the frequency of extrapair paternityin broods of great tits, Parus major using multilocus DNA fingerprinting.We found no instances of intraspecific brood parasitism, but40% of broods (31/78) contained extrapair-fathered young and83% of offspring (58/681) were xtrapair We identified the geneticfathers of 60% of the extrapair nestlings (35/ 58). Males withfull and lost paternity did not differ significantly in traitsthat have been suggested to indicate male quality, nor did thegenetic and social fathers of extrapair offspring. In 1993,cuckolded males sired more offspring that recruited to the subsequentbreeding season than males with full paternity. Moreover, eventhough genetic fathers of extrapair young (EPY) sired more fledglingsthan the males they cuckolded, genetic and social fathers ofEPY did not differ in the number of recruits sired. Also, theEPY of a brood did not survive better than their half sibs.Thus, our results do not supportthe hypothesis that femaleschoose better quality males for extrapair matings ("good genes"hypothesis). Further, the level of extrapair paternity differedmarkedly between the two years. Our data show that females areconstrained in their extrapair activities by the availabilityof extrapair mates. This is at least partly due to yearly differencesin breeding synchrony.     

Strategic paternity assurance in the sex-role reversed Eurasian dotterel (Charadrius morinellus): behavioral and genetic evidence

Sex role reversal in birds is usually associated with paternalcare of both eggs and chicks. This pattern of care typicallyleads to the potential rate of reproduction of males being lowerthan that of females. Hence, operational sex-ratio theory predictsthat each male should be under strong selection to avoid beingcuckolded. A male should, therefore, guard his female partner(s)from extrapair copulation attempts by other males. Furthermore,the sexual conflict theory of copulation behavior predicts thatin species with extensive paternal care the male should controlthe temporal pattern of copulations—copulations shouldoccur both frequently and throughout the prelaying period. Wetested these predictions in the Eurasian dotterel (Charadriusmorinsllus), in which the male usually provides all the parentalcare. In accordance with the first prediction, male dotterelsdid "guard" their pair-female prior to egg-laying. Contraryto the second prediction, however, copulations were not frequentand did not occur throughout the pre-laying phase-despite frequentsolicitation by the female, copulations only occurred immediatelyprior to egg-laying. Nevertheless, male-initiated courtshipwas both coincident with the pattern of copulations and morelikely than female-initiated courtship to result in copulation.Our results do, therefore, appear to agree with the centralprediction of the sexual conflict theory that males should controlthe pattern of copulations. We suggest that male dotterels willcopulate only after several days of being paired because theyface a duel risk of cuckoldry from both extrapair copulationand rapid mate switching. We tested the realized incidence ofcuckoldry using DNA fingerprinting. Only 4.6% (2/44) of chickswere not the genetic offspring of the caring male correspondingto 9.1% (2/22) broods affected. The rate of extrapair paternityin the dotterel is, therefore, relatively low compared to thatin many other avian species. We conclude that male dotterelssuccessfully protect their paternity of the brood for whichthey care through a combined strategy of mate guarding and strategictiming of copulations.     

Timing of prenuptial molt as a sexually selected indicator of male quality in superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus)

Seasonally dichromatic male superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus)solicit extra-group fertilizations through displays of theirbrightly colored nuptial plumage during visits to females inneighboring territories. This ornamental plumage is lost atthe end of the breeding season, and reacquired before the nextbreeding season after a highly variable period spent in a cryptic,female-like, "eclipse" plumage. Individuals start visiting femalesas soon as they return to nuptial plumage, often several monthsbefore the start of breeding.We examine variation in the timingof acquisition of nuptial plumage in relation to environmentalconditions and the age, social status, and condition of males.We show that males undergo the prenuptial molt earlier as theyage and when in superior condition, and that molt is delayedin years of more adverse winter weather conditions. We proposethat the purpose of male displays may be to advertise theirquality, and that females use this variation in the timing ofacquisition of nuptial plumage to assess the relative qualityof prospective extra-group mates. Molting earlier is apparentlycostlier, so this handicap would appear to be a reliable reflectionof male quality.     

Large brain size is associated with low extra‐pair paternity across bird species

BackgroundGaining extrapair copulations (EPCs) is a complicated behavior process. The interaction between males and females to procure EPCs may be involved in brain function evolution and lead to a larger brain. Thus, we hypothesized that extrapair paternity (EPP) rate can be predicted by relative brain size in birds. Past work has implied that the EPP rate is associated with brain size, but empirical evidence is rare.MethodsWe collated data from published references on EPP levels and brain size of 215 bird species to examine whether the evolution of EPP rate can be predicted by brain size using phylogenetically generalized least square (PGLS) models and phylogenetic path analyses.ResultsWe found that EPP rates (both the percentage EP offspring and percentage of broods with EP offspring) are negatively associated with relative brain size. We applied phylogenetic path analysis to test the causal relationship between relative brain size and EPP rate. Best‐supported models (ΔCICc < 2) suggested that large brain lead to reduced EPP rate, which failed to support the hypothesis that high rates of EPP cause the evolution of larger brains.ConclusionThis study indicates that pursuing EPCs may be a natural instinct in birds and the interaction between males and females for EPCs may lead to large brains, which in turn may restrict their EPC level for both sexes across bird species.     

Low frequency of extrapair paternity in the polygynous great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus

We carried out DNA fingerprinting on 553 young (130 broods)great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundnaceus) in 1987–1991.In the study population, where 40% of the males become polygynous,there was a low frequency of extrapair fertilizations (EPF).When data from all five years were pooled, 3.1% of the youngwere sired by extrapair males (EPF-males) and 5.4% of the broodscontained extrapair young. We found no cases of extrapair maternity;young with 6–17 mismatched DNA bands (n= 17) had highband sharing with their putative mothers (range = 0.52–0.72)but low band sharing with their putative fathers (range = 0.24–0.40).In broods exposed to EPF, on average 53% of the young were siredby EPF-males. We found the genetic father to each of the illegitimateyoung. In all cases the same EPF-male sired all extrapair youngin a brood. Broods containing EPF-young tended to be initiatedlate during the breeding season. Breeding attempts were ratherevenly distributed over two months, thus this breeding asynchronywould have facilitated EPFs. There was no difference in EPFfrequency between broods where the pair males had left theirfemales unguarded during parts of their fertile periods andbroods where males guarded throughout the fertile periods. Nestswith extrapair young had significantly shorter mean distanceto the closest male neighbor and more male neighbors within100 m than nests without extrapair young. We found no indicationthat females engaged in EPF to get parental care from the EPF-males,or because they were forced to copulate with extrapair males.The low frequency of EPF suggested that females did not seekgenetic diversity to their brood. We cannot rule out the possibilitythat females engaged in EPF to insure fertility. However, datasupporting this hypothesis were weak. Instead, our data supportthe conclusion that females engaged in EPF to increase the geneticquality of their offspring, and that females may have used malesong repertoire size as a cue when choosing EPF partners.